End-of-year projects which circuits are you wrapping up?

Alan

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Joined
Feb 21, 2025
Messages
382
You've been eyeing that half-finished board on your workbench, convincing yourself that you'll just solder one more thing before the year ends. Now, you're curious about what everyone else is trying to complete before the calendar changes. Share the circuits you're finishing, fixing, or finally accepting you'll have to push into next year. Keep it straightforward and real.
 
The big project on my plate is a sensor board I designed for a home automation idea, which has turned into a lot more troubleshooting than I expected. A flaky regulator and a bad batch of headers have really set me back, and it’s been sitting on my bench for weeks, just staring at me.
 
I have this little LED driver board that’s been sitting half-finished since summer. I keep telling myself it’ll take just “five more minutes,” but deep down, I know it’s pushing into next year.
 
I’ve been working on a small audio preamp I started after salvaging parts from an old stereo. I thought it’d be a quick weekend project, but figuring out the noise issues has taken way longer than I anticipated. I have a feeling it’s going to be my first project of 2026.
 
Seems like everyone's in the same boat, with projects either stuck in place or just waiting for their turn. Thanks for showing what's up with your stuff.

My project list seems to get three added to it every time I finish one.
Haha, ain't that the maker's life? You finish one project and bam, three more pop up like magic. Keeps things interesting in the workshop, I guess
 
For the past several months I have been stealing time from my main projects to complete a little DAS for testing hearing aid batteries. The idea is to test a variety of brands to see which brand performs best, and be able to do a retest periodically to verify that the leader has not become the slacker. Since I joined the growing number of people wearing this fashion accessory I have been really disappointed in the increasingly poor performance of zinc-air batteries. Some well-known brands in the alkaline type are terrible at making zinc-air.
The concept seemed relatively simple: a little gain (3x) added to a half-wave non-inverting precision rectifier to protect the inputs of an AVR328 on an Arduino Nano would give me the ability to test eight batteries at a time under simulated load conditions. And I had most of the parts. Easy stuff for an AVR. My troubles came with the rectifier -- which I have never built but seemed easy enough -- just a diode in the feedback loop - NBD.
I made the mistake of consulting that source of all knowledge, the internet, which told me that I needed a second diode to keep the opamp out of saturation if it swung negative. Well, maybe it works that way in an inverting configuration, but non-inverting? I dunno. I still dunno and don't care. It would never go into saturation unless I hooked up a battery backwards, but recalling my last experience jumping car batteries it seemed like a good idea to have some reverse polarity protection. AC performance, which doesn't matter for this project, was okay, but DC performance sucked. With AC down to 5Hz everything worked, but that was as low as my signal generator would go. With DC input (a pot across the +- rails) the opamp would saturate as soon as I adjusted the input to negative and stay there until forced positive by a positive voltage greater than the negative saturation voltage. If I disconnected the source it would leisurely drift positive until it crossed zero, then rapidly shoot up to positive saturation. Yikes!
No longer having a colleague to bounce things off of, I turned to that well known sage, chatGPT, which sent me on wild goose chase after wild goose chase, adding resistors and even more diodes until Mr. Chat told me that parts outside the feedback loop were the eproblem. I finally realized that Mr. Chad had no clue what he was talking about and I had to do this the old fashioned way. I pulled out a fresh protoboard and built the simplest possible precision rectifier: a diode in the feedback loop of a voltage follower, and it worked. AC up to 45kHz with a 5532 all the way down to DC. Saturation was no problem with this thing, it never latched up. I added my gain of 3 and it still worked perfectly. Now I will not blow any of my precious AVR inputs with reverse polarity batteries under test and I get to use all ten bits of that rather run of the mill ADC in the AVR328 becasue I have a rectifier with gain.

I haven't finished the beast yet, but this was the hurdle to overcome. All the rest is point to point wiring and code. ChatGPT is pretty good at writing code. Just don't expect much help on circuit design, it sucks at that.

This is my debut post, other than my introduction, which is rather brief. If it bothers you, yes, most of my posts are lengthy. I have a well-earned reputation for being rather wordy, even verbose, but I believe every word I write is necessary, even when I repeat repeat words. If you don't like it you can complain and I might make an adjustment -- or I might not. I am rather set in my ways. I hope you enjoyed the post.
 
For the past several months I have been stealing time from my main projects to complete a little DAS for testing hearing aid batteries. The idea is to test a variety of brands to see which brand performs best, and be able to do a retest periodically to verify that the leader has not become the slacker. Since I joined the growing number of people wearing this fashion accessory I have been really disappointed in the increasingly poor performance of zinc-air batteries. Some well-known brands in the alkaline type are terrible at making zinc-air.
The concept seemed relatively simple: a little gain (3x) added to a half-wave non-inverting precision rectifier to protect the inputs of an AVR328 on an Arduino Nano would give me the ability to test eight batteries at a time under simulated load conditions. And I had most of the parts. Easy stuff for an AVR. My troubles came with the rectifier -- which I have never built but seemed easy enough -- just a diode in the feedback loop - NBD.
I made the mistake of consulting that source of all knowledge, the internet, which told me that I needed a second diode to keep the opamp out of saturation if it swung negative. Well, maybe it works that way in an inverting configuration, but non-inverting? I dunno. I still dunno and don't care. It would never go into saturation unless I hooked up a battery backwards, but recalling my last experience jumping car batteries it seemed like a good idea to have some reverse polarity protection. AC performance, which doesn't matter for this project, was okay, but DC performance sucked. With AC down to 5Hz everything worked, but that was as low as my signal generator would go. With DC input (a pot across the +- rails) the opamp would saturate as soon as I adjusted the input to negative and stay there until forced positive by a positive voltage greater than the negative saturation voltage. If I disconnected the source it would leisurely drift positive until it crossed zero, then rapidly shoot up to positive saturation. Yikes!
No longer having a colleague to bounce things off of, I turned to that well known sage, chatGPT, which sent me on wild goose chase after wild goose chase, adding resistors and even more diodes until Mr. Chat told me that parts outside the feedback loop were the eproblem. I finally realized that Mr. Chad had no clue what he was talking about and I had to do this the old fashioned way. I pulled out a fresh protoboard and built the simplest possible precision rectifier: a diode in the feedback loop of a voltage follower, and it worked. AC up to 45kHz with a 5532 all the way down to DC. Saturation was no problem with this thing, it never latched up. I added my gain of 3 and it still worked perfectly. Now I will not blow any of my precious AVR inputs with reverse polarity batteries under test and I get to use all ten bits of that rather run of the mill ADC in the AVR328 becasue I have a rectifier with gain.

I haven't finished the beast yet, but this was the hurdle to overcome. All the rest is point to point wiring and code. ChatGPT is pretty good at writing code. Just don't expect much help on circuit design, it sucks at that.

This is my debut post, other than my introduction, which is rather brief. If it bothers you, yes, most of my posts are lengthy. I have a well-earned reputation for being rather wordy, even verbose, but I believe every word I write is necessary, even when I repeat repeat words. If you don't like it you can complain and I might make an adjustment -- or I might not. I am rather set in my ways. I hope you enjoyed the post.
Thank you for the detailed share. Your project sounds captivating, and I think it’s fantastic how you dealt with that challenging circuit. I can’t wait to see how it all comes together.
 
Back
Top